[address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin Millnert
millnert at gmail.com
Mon Oct 24 20:56:06 CEST 2011
Hi, On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:01:12PM +0100, boggits wrote: >> On 21 October 2011 11:44, Emilio Madaio <emadaio at ripe.net> wrote: >> > www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-04 >> >> Okay, I can see the logic, but please can we not do this :) >> >> I'm all for allowing a policy that says LIR can request a /29 rather >> than a /32 and that deploying 6rd is a valid reason for allocating a >> /29 as an initial block but can we do this by having the LIR send the >> documentation in and having it reviewed for logic. > > The feedback we got at the last RIPE meeting was "please do not tie this > to a specific transition technology, and go down the rathole of potentially > having to revoke the allocation if 6rd is no longer in use". > > So the proposers have decided to go for the "minimum fuzz" thing - ask > for it, get it. > > I'm not exactly sure how you're proposing to modify this? "Special case > for 6rd only"? My personal opinion on 6RD is: if it is to be treated as a special case, it should be a special case, meaning it is a temporary allocation (like all others, but with emphasis), valid only so long it is used. A 6RD allocation should be 100% 6RD and no other use of it should be allowed, so that it can easily be returned once the 6RD deployment is no longer in use. That, or, roll native. ;) Best, Martin
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]