[address-policy-wg] Seen this?: (Was: IP Broker for -1.-1.-1.-1)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Seen this?: (Was: IP Broker for -1.-1.-1.-1)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Seen this?: (Was: IP Broker for -1.-1.-1.-1)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Oct 18 15:48:10 CEST 2012
Hi, On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 03:45:01PM +0200, Ond??ej Surý wrote: > > Transferring address blocks to those in need and receiving monetary > > compensation in exchange is *not* against RIPE policies. > > > > To the contrary, it is expected that the transfers are registered with > > the RIPE NCC so people know who currently "owns"(*) an address block. > > The email/proposition talks about "leases", and not transfers. Transfers can be temporary. > And if I remember correctly you should return unused blocks and not > lease them, don't you? You are certainly welcome to return unsed blocks to the RIPE NCC, but you do not *have* to - the policies for allocations do not require that (and there is no provision for the NCC to forcibly take them back either), that's only for assignments. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 7650 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20121018/b5cc1f2e/attachment.bin>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Seen this?: (Was: IP Broker for -1.-1.-1.-1)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Seen this?: (Was: IP Broker for -1.-1.-1.-1)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]