[address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Call to Order (was: Opposing policy 2015-01)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Garry Glendown
garry at nethinks.com
Wed Jul 1 08:04:02 CEST 2015
On 01.07.2015 07:38, Shahin Gharghi wrote: > Hi > > I agree with Arash and also people can transfer their IP's after two > years. So the proposal doesn't help again. > > So, in essence, you would rather do NOTHING than accept the proposal, which at least - at the moment - significantly increases cost for IP-traders, while at the same time giving us additional time to come up with a better solution (which probably takes another year to come up with, discuss, optimize, and pass)? Why don't you enlighten us how you would improve 2015-1 in order to prevent abuse of the current policy? If you have any good ideas, I believe all of the people on the list would appreciate any constructive input? -garry
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Call to Order (was: Opposing policy 2015-01)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]