[address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andre Keller
ak at list.ak.cx
Mon Jul 13 19:42:40 CEST 2015
Hi, On 09.07.2015 14:19, Marco Schmidt wrote: > We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments > to address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 7 August 2015. tl;dr: I support the proposal in the current state. I do not really think this will help the routing table growth as outlined in section B of the impact analysis though. The organisations that are likely to request address space under the proposed rules will probably announce the received address space with some sort of de-aggregation. But I do think this proposal can remove constraints some organisation currently have when deploying (or trying to deploy) IPv6. g André
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]