[address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
apwg at c4inet.net
Fri Oct 21 13:42:48 CEST 2016
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 01:17:32PM +0200, Havard Eidnes wrote: >> As for 2015-04, I oppose it as it tries yet again to bring M&A >> under policy regulation (s. 2.2) which the community has no >> business doing. > >Please educate me why the community has no business doing this. >I would have thought that was well within scope for the address >policy. In market-based economies, M&As -including the disposal of assets- are a matter for the parties involved and, occasionally, a state regulator, which the NCC is NOT. It is unthinkable in such a society that business decisions are subject to the whim of random people on a mailing list. The RIPE NCC recognises that and puts M&A firmly outside policy. Where it should remain unless the desire is that every transfer application or M&A notification start with filing suit against the NCC. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Version and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]