[address-policy-wg] 2023-01 Review Phase (Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-01 Review Phase (Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-01 Review Phase (Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Arnold Nipper
arnold.nipper at de-cix.net
Mon Jul 3 20:08:21 CEST 2023
+1 to what Matthias, Tore, and Steven said. So, I also reiterate my support for moving 2023-01 forward. Arnold On 03.07.2023 18:46, Steven Bakker via address-policy-wg wrote: > Although I agree that the 50% number is problematic, the explanation by > Marco is sufficient for me to vote "aye" on this proposal. > > Yes, we should probably fix this at some point, but I agree with > Matthias that, given Marco's explanation, this should not be part of > this particular round of review. > > Cheers, > Steven > > On Fri, 2023-06-30 at 09:58 +0000, Matthias Wichtlhuber via > address-policy-wg wrote: >> >>> 1. problematic edge cases in section 5 due to the magic figure of 50% >>> utilisation >>> 2. what is a "special circumstance"? >> >> The proposal does not modify existing numbers (50%) or the "special >> circumstances". Both are in the current policy already (see old policy >> text 6.1 .4). I think the changes you propose should be done in a >> separate policy proposal as they are an addition to this policy >> proposal rather than a change. >> >> Nevertheless RIPE has clarified how they handle the 50% issue >> currently (see Marco Schmidt's mail from mid May): >> >>> When receiving requests for more than a /24, the RIPE NCC checks that >>> the IXP will need more than 50% of the assignment within one year. If >>> their growth rate is too slow and we expect that it will take more than >>> a year to exceed that utilisation threshold, we suggest that they >>> postpone their request. >> >> Thus, this issue is not urgent and can be discussed separately. I hope >> that answers open questions. >> >> Regards, >> Matthias >> >> -- >> Dr.-Ing. Matthias Wichtlhuber >> Team Lead Research and Development >> ------------------------------ >> DE-CIX Management GmbH >> Lindleystr. 12, 60314 Frankfurt (Germany) >> phone: +49 69 1730902 141 >> mobile: +49 171 3836036 >> fax: +49 69 4056 2716 >> e-mail: matthias.wichtlhuber at de-cix.net >> <mailto:matthias.wichtlhuber at de-cix.net> >> web: >> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.de-cix.net%2F&data=05%7C01%7Csteven.bakker%40ams-ix.net%7C0baf6acaa3a04e5ebb6408db79508c78%7C09d28fc155624961a4848ce4932094ae%7C0%7C0%7C638237159103038008%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=nGK%2BWwN4RXt1p6Fsa%2FjUCwiUQdtvrBVWYenKY3AekaE%3D&reserved=0 <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.de-cix.net%2F&data=05%7C01%7Csteven.bakker%40ams-ix.net%7C0baf6acaa3a04e5ebb6408db79508c78%7C09d28fc155624961a4848ce4932094ae%7C0%7C0%7C638237159103038008%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=nGK%2BWwN4RXt1p6Fsa%2FjUCwiUQdtvrBVWYenKY3AekaE%3D&reserved=0> >> ------------------------------ >> DE-CIX Management GmbH >> Executive Directors: Ivaylo Ivanov and Sebastian Seifert >> Trade registry: District court (Amtsgericht) Cologne, HRB 51135 >> Registered office: Lichtstr. 43i, 50825 Cologne >> >> ________________________________________ >> Von: address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net >> <mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net>> im Auftrag von Cynthia >> Revström via address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg at ripe.net >> <mailto:address-policy-wg at ripe.net>> >> Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Juni 2023 00:55:35 >> An: Nick Hilliard >> Cc: RIPE Address Policy Working Group >> Betreff: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2023-01 Review Phase (Reducing IXP >> IPv4 assignment default size to a /26) >> >> I agree with Nick here regarding 1. >> These magic numbers should really be fixed. >> >> -Cynthia >> >> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 10:55 PM Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org >> <mailto:nick at foobar.org>> wrote: >>> >>> Angela Dall'Ara wrote on 29/06/2023 15:19: >>> >>> It is therefore important to provide your opinion, even if it is >>> simply a restatement of your input from the previous phase. >>> >>> >>> this version of the document hasn't addressed the problems I raised >>> on April 26. The authors need to give some consideration about what >>> might be the best approach to fixing them: >>> >>> 1. problematic edge cases in section 5 due to the magic figure of 50% >>> utilisation >>> 2. what is a "special circumstance"? >>> >>> I don't believe that the document should progress until these issues >>> are addressed. >>> >>> Nick > > -- Arnold Nipper Chief Technology Evangelist and Co-Founder DE-CIX Management GmbH Lindleystraße 12 | 60314 Frankfurt a.M. | Germany Phone +49 69 1730902 22 | Mobile +49 172 2650958 arnold.nipper at de-cix.net | www.de-cix.net Geschaeftsfuehrer Ivaylo Ivanov und Sebastian Seifert Registergericht AG Koeln HRB 51135 Want to work at DE-CIX: https://de-cix.net/en/about-de-cix/careers -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 203 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20230703/6db18815/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-01 Review Phase (Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2023-01 Review Phase (Reducing IXP IPv4 assignment default size to a /26)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]