[anti-abuse-wg] Spam under protection. Believe it or not!
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam under protection. Believe it or not!
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam under protection. Believe it or not!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Mon Sep 28 14:42:41 CEST 2015
Let me introduce you to, say, fast flux botnets that skip from one IP to another in seconds IPs matter. So do domains. So do nameservers. So do [a bunch of other things] Registrars can’t abdicate their responsibility by claiming spam is entirely related to IP addresses. > On 28-Sep-2015, at 5:50 PM, andre at ox.co.za wrote: > > Spam is not a domain thing, it is an IP thing. > > So why are we focused on domain names? a name is nothing, > it cannot route, a number routes.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam under protection. Believe it or not!
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam under protection. Believe it or not!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]