[anti-abuse-wg] GDPR - positive effects on email abuse
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] GDPR - positive effects on email abuse
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] GDPR - positive effects on email abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
aawg at c4inet.net
Tue May 29 17:54:57 CEST 2018
Hi Carlos, On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 03:38:08PM +0100, Carlos Friaas wrote: >One can argue that a "real abuse contact" related to a DNS domain is >necessary for the contract's performance, no? >The same is valid about the contract between RIPE/NCC and LIRs over >assigned IP address space, right? You can argue that - it's the meat of the noyb ./. FB and Google cases, aiui. You can also argue that publishing this data without any access control is *not* necessary to the operation of the registry and therefore access to services can't be made contingent on consent to this. I predict there will be a court case over this very soon. cheers, Sascha Luck > >Cheers, >Carlos > > >On Tue, 29 May 2018, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: > >>On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 02:50:09PM +0200, Simon Forster wrote: >>>Would you be able to point to the section of the GDPR which states >>>this? Admission: I have yet to make it to the end of the 88 pages >>>of the act without falling asleep. >> >>It derives (also the tenor of NOYB's filing, aiui) from Article >>7(4): >> >>"4. When assessing whether consent is freely given, utmost >>account shall be taken of whether, inter alia, the performance of >>a contract, including the provision of a service, is conditional >>on consent to the processing of personal data that is not >>necessary for the performance of that contract." >> >>http://www.privacy-regulation.eu/en/article-7-conditions-for-consent-GDPR.htm >> >>cheers, >>Sascha Luck >> >>> >>>>The first case regarding this has already been filed: >>>>https://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/max-schrems-files-first-cases-under-gdpr-against-facebook-and-google-1.3508177 <https://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/max-schrems-files-first-cases-under-gdpr-against-facebook-and-google-1.3508177> >>>I appreciate a motion has been filed. However, I???d surprised if >>>the case purely revolved around this single point. >>> >>>It is positive that some of this stuff is going to be tested in >>>court sooner rather than later. Having said that, it may be >>><sarcasm> a day or two </sarcasm> before we get to see a final >>>judgement with no further appeals. >>> >>>All the best >>> >>>Simon >>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] GDPR - positive effects on email abuse
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] GDPR - positive effects on email abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]