[anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact addresses ?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact addresses ?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact addresses ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Serge Droz
serge.droz at first.org
Fri Mar 8 11:53:41 CET 2019
Hi I'm fairly new here. This is a formidable task, and not easily achieved. So kudos to RIPE for doing this. The abuse contacts already there helped me a lot. I don't appreciate people who can't even stand up with their real names, just pointing out that others are lame. We make this a better world by helping with advice that empowers, not with diminish comments. Cheers Serge On 08.03.19 11:40, Shane Kerr wrote: > Fi Shing, > > I'm sure verifying the delivery of 70k e-mails (or however many is in > the database) can be done in a few hours. > > But Marco's response mentions to *correcting* the contact addresses, not > just verifying them. That involves working with human beings, so it > makes sense that it will take a while. > > Cheers, > > -- > Shane > > On 08/03/2019 11.07, Fi Shing wrote: >> If it takes more than a week to verify your entire database, there is >> the first sign that something is wrong with your system. >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact >> addresses ? >> From: Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net <mailto:mschmidt at ripe.net>> >> Date: Thu, March 07, 2019 10:03 pm >> To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg at tristatelogic.com >> <mailto:rfg at tristatelogic.com>>, >> anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net <mailto:anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> >> >> Hello Ronald, >> >> We are planning to publish an updated timeline soon. >> >> Ultimately, our implementation will depend of the level of >> cooperation >> we get from LIRs and the nature of issues that need to be fixed >> before >> an abuse contact can be updated (for example, some organisations may >> need to reset their maintainer password). >> >> Over the next few weeks we will be analysing our progress, to make a >> realistic estimation. From observations so far, we think we might be >> able to finish our initial validation of all abuse contacts within >> six >> months - but it is still too early to make any strong predictions. >> >> Kind regards, >> Marco Schmidt >> RIPE NCC >> >> >> On 05/03/2019 21:51, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >> > In message <9c95c110-d5a3-e94a-6b3c-b02030736e7c at ripe.net >> <mailto:9c95c110-d5a3-e94a-6b3c-b02030736e7c at ripe.net>>, >> > Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net <mailto:mschmidt at ripe.net>> wrote: >> > >> >> It is correct that the implementation phase is still ongoing. >> Currently >> >> we are validating all the abuse contact information referenced >> in LIR >> >> organisation objects. Then we will proceed with the validation >> of abuse >> >> contacts referenced in LIR resource objects - the example that you >> >> mentioned belongs to this group. And finally all abuse contacts >> >> referenced in End User (sponsored) objects will be validated. >> > Thanks for the info Marco. >> > >> > I guess the only question I would ask is this: Is there a >> published >> > timeline for how this whole process is planned to play out, and for >> > when it is planned to be completed? >> > >> > >> > Regards, >> > rfg >> > >> >> > > -- Dr. Serge Droz Member of the FIRST Board of Directors Senior Advisor ICT4Peace https://www.first.org https://www.ict4peace.org
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact addresses ?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact addresses ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]