[anti-abuse-wg] Webzilla
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Webzilla
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Report: Law Enforcement Agency Requests 2018
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Mon Mar 18 22:26:04 CET 2019
In message <6f358385-b1c7-0805-47f0-50e926cbe13c at tana.it>, you wrote: >On Sat 16/Mar/2019 21:15:22 +0100 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > >> First, I am inclined to wonder aloud why anyone is even still peering >> with any of the several ASNs mentioned in the report. To me, the mere >> fact that any of these ASNs still have connectivity represents a clear >> and self-evident failure of "self policing" in and among the networks >> that comprise the Internet. > > >RIRs cannot themselves enact block lists such as Spamhaus DROP. However, those >ASNs could well make their way to such lists. Why don't they? I only wish that I knew. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Webzilla
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Report: Law Enforcement Agency Requests 2018
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]