[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ac
ac at main.me
Wed Mar 20 09:29:26 CET 2019
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:15:06 +0200 (IST) Hank Nussbacher <hank at efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote: > I think we have different expections from criminals. I view the > criminals as ones who analyze every RFC and every standard to > determine where they can be abused or manipulated for their benefit. > A sanction that would be implemented 18 months later would allow the > evil LIR enough time to sell their resources to some other LIR such > that they would not lose such resources. > -Hank > +1 see this with many other types of abuse for example email abuse: DKIM means nothing (is a complete waste of time) and SPF is useless (unless the TXT contains an "-") etc etc. > > people care, and playing havoc with BGP (intentional or > > accidentially) has hardly any consequences at all. > > > > OTOH, these are the questions that make me undecided on the > > proposal :-) > > +1 > > Gert Doering > > -- NetMaster > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]