[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Thu Mar 21 11:38:23 CET 2019
Thanks for the input! Trying to "retouch" 5.0: ======== 5.0 Retroactivity Only hijacking events that occur after this policy has been implemented are eligible to be considered. Evidence older than 18 months (counted from the date where a report is filed) should be disregarded by experts. ======== Best Regards, Carlos On Thu, 21 Mar 2019, Piotr Strzyzewski wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 09:18:02AM +0000, Carlos Friaças wrote: > > Dear Carlos, > >> What would be reasonable for you? >> >> 2 or 3 years before the date when the report is filed? > > I was thinking more about weeks not years. Mostly due to the nature of > the incident(s) itself. However, I'm not strongly opposed to 2y term. > > Piotr > > -- > Piotr Strzy?ewski > Silesian University of Technology, Computer Centre > Gliwice, Poland >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]