[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 and over-reach
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 and over-reach
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 and over-reach
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Sun Mar 24 12:03:11 CET 2019
Hi, It's probably best to state examples using "country X" and "region Y" instead of using countries' concrete names. I think i already used concrete country names at least once during this thread and i apologize for that. ps: if we ackowledge there is a gap in legislation and enforcement why shouldn't we engineer something to try to minimize/reduce this gap's effects? Best Regards, Carlos On Sat, 23 Mar 2019, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > In message <6179dc11-f299-c076-0ae1-2f2d22eb6115 at foobar.org>, > Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote: > >> If there were legislation and enforcement in this area, we wouldn't be >> having this conversation. > > Yes, actually, we would. > > Does anybody really believe that if, for example, Moldova outlawed BGP > hijacking tomorrow *and* if they even started arresting suspects, that > the entire problem would utterly disappear from the entire RIPE region > the day after that? I think not. France? The Neatherlands? Sweden? > No. No. No. There isn't a single european country whose laws can > bring this plague to an end, nor even any subset of european countries. > The problem no more respects national boundaries than does the influenza > virus. > > Furthermore, I very much look forward to the day when one or more BGP > hijackers... or *any* kind of cybercriminal for that matter... will be > extradited from Russia to stand trial in some less friendly jurisdiction. > But today is not that day. > > > Regards, > rfg >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 and over-reach
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 and over-reach
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]