[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
No No
no0484985 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 30 03:47:02 CEST 2020
Well if it's a fundamental right to do business, and someone can't do business because their network is subject to a DDoS or their communication medium (email) is spammed by someone from a network where the network operator "ignores" abuse emails, and has to spend money sorting through spam emails, then this policy promotes so called "business rights" ---- On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 2:22 AM Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote: > Serge Droz via anti-abuse-wg wrote on 29/04/2020 16:55: > > So, it's the security guys, saying > > > > This may help a bit, but won't solve all problems. > > > > versus the infrastructure operators saying > > > > Beware! This it creating huge costs and will not help at all, and > > answering two mails a year will be our ruin. > > The root problem is that the policy proposes to use the RIPE NCC to > enforce abuse management processes. > > The specifics in this iteration of the document are to threaten and then > act to deregister an organisation's number resources - and thereby > remove their ability to conduct business - if the organisation declines > to handle abuse complaints over email. > > To be clear, it's a fundamental right in large chunks of the RIPE > service region to conduct business. If the RIPE NCC acts to threaten to > remove this ability to conduct business, there would need to be sound > legal justification for doing so. > > Nick > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20200430/e5b8718e/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]