clueing in TLD registries for delegations to non-BIND servers
- Previous message (by thread): clueing in TLD registries for delegations to non-BIND servers
- Next message (by thread): clueing in TLD registries for delegations to non-BIND servers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brad Knowles
brad.knowles at skynet.be
Sat Feb 8 03:01:07 CET 2003
At 7:47 PM +0100 2003/02/07, Jakob Schlyter wrote: > if you do not include a hints file in nsd's database, it will return > SERVFAIL. Are you saying that it will hand out a referral if this information is configured into the database? If so, then I would be much less unhappy with the way it is working. Maybe this code isn't on by default, but it's much better than not being there at all. > if you set up bind9 with a authoritative-only view it will return REFUSED. > in a "normal" configuration, it will use pre-compiled root-hints. Right, but REFUSED != SERVFAIL. -- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+ !w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++) tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
- Previous message (by thread): clueing in TLD registries for delegations to non-BIND servers
- Next message (by thread): clueing in TLD registries for delegations to non-BIND servers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]