[dns-wg] RIPE NCC domain registrations
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC domain registrations
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC domain registrations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Jun 30 16:33:25 CEST 2015
On 30 Jun 2015, at 15:25, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote: > There's no policy requirement, but it's good practice for the NCC to > consult with the community for something like this. It keeps one side > honest and the other side well-informed. Indeed. > FWIW, I'm in favour of dropping all the inactive / registration protection > domains. There are no compelling reasons to keep any of them. No hats... <AOL Mode>Me too!</AOL Mode> IMO the domain names Romeo's list are long overdue for removal. I strongly support their orderly and timely removal.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC domain registrations
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE NCC domain registrations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]