[ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sergey
gforgx at fotontel.ru
Sun Jun 12 21:43:38 CEST 2016
Thanks for the link! On 06/12/16 22:36, Antonio Prado wrote: > On 6/12/16 9:24 PM, Sergey wrote: >> AFAIK, the minimum allocated space from RIRs is /48. Should we filter >> prefixes longer than this? > I do. > > look also at this case study of IPv6 /48 filtering > > https://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/ripe-atlas-a-case-study-of-ipv6-48-filtering > -- > antonio > -- Kind regards, CTO at *Foton Telecom CJSC (ru.fotontelecom)* Tel.: +7 (499) 679-99-99 AS42861 on PeeringDB <http://as42861.peeringdb.com/>, Qrator <https://radar.qrator.net/as42861>, BGP.HE.NET <http://bgp.he.net/AS42861> http://ipv6actnow.org/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20160612/171e9056/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]