[ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Colin Petrie
cpetrie at ripe.net
Wed Jun 15 11:41:42 CEST 2016
On 15/06/16 05:35, Mark Tinka wrote: > I'm not sure whether operators are going to be accepting IPv4 routes > longer than a /24. It was spoken about for a long time, as we all knew > this day would come. But considering how expensive line cards are, I'm > not overly optimistic it will happen (or happen quickly, widely). We tried this out last year: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/has-the-routability-of-longer-than-24-prefixes-changed TL;DR - global usefulness of longer-than-/24 is still pretty low. Cheers Colin -- Colin Petrie Systems Engineer RIPE NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Maximum acceptable IPv6 prefix in BGP table?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]