[ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG

Hello Jen Link,

Il 03/10/2019 13:55, Jens Link ha scritto:
> Uros Gaber <uros at ub330.net> writes:
>
>> 1. WHY should it have NAT
> NATs are good. They provide security.
Are you sure you are about networking?
>
>> 2. What do you understand under class, IPv4 "Classes" are just defined
>> subnet groups (simply put)
> Things need names. Numbers are hard to remember. We have Class-A for /8,
> Class-B for /16 and Class-C for /24. We need names for the others as
> well.
>   
>> 3. AFAIK DHCPv6 is defined in RFC (3319,3646,4704,5007,6221,6355,6939,8415)
> But it's DHCPv6. Not DHCP! It works differently. And Android does not
> support it. Enterprise Customers want DHCP!
>   
>> 6. Dots and colon, what's the difference?
> I have do change my regex.
>
>> 7. Use DNS to resolve - no [] needed then.
> DNS is to hard, to complex and fails to often. And in enterprise
> networks it probably done by another team.
>    
>> [5] what does the script have to do with network layer?
> The script was just an example for software breaking when you implement
> something that looks completely different like IPv4. I this case the
> script is parsing log files and netflow data and we are back to the
> regex.
>
> Jens

  __
Riccardo