[ipv6-wg] RIPE80 Call for Presentations
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE80 Call for Presentations
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE80 Call for Presentations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aftab Siddiqui
me at aftabsiddiqui.com
Fri May 1 14:14:49 CEST 2020
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 7:06 PM Tim Chown <Tim.Chown at jisc.ac.uk> wrote: > > On 1 May 2020, at 04:44, Jen Linkova <furry13 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I'd not assume that IPv6 is not getting deployed (only) because it's > > hard or because of > > the technical difficulties. > > Maybe you are more lucky but I personally have a lot of things on my > > 'would be nice to get done' list - and none > > of them are hard to do. It's just they keep getting postponed because > > if other things which are either more urgent or more important. > > I'd not be surprised if IPv6 deployments suffer from the same issue > quite often. > > I think this is spot on; IPv6 never makes it to the top of the list for > most organisations. > >From my previous life, almost 6/7years ago the decision to either go with IPv6 (network was ready and we did the POC as well) or buy more IPv4 blocks was made on the basis of a 2/3sec pause from the engineering head in response to a BU head questioning "are you confident that IPv6 is not going to create any problems?" 2 days later I was talking to brokers. Fast forward, I would be interested if someone who can do myth busting for c-suite would be great. A Panel may be? Best Wishes, Aftab Siddiqui -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20200501/1e0f80b2/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE80 Call for Presentations
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE80 Call for Presentations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]