[ipv6-wg] Allocating a /16 to a large enterprise ?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Allocating a /16 to a large enterprise ?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Allocating a /16 to a large enterprise ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeroen Massar
jeroen at massar.ch
Mon Dec 11 08:55:55 CET 2023
> On 11 Dec 2023, at 08:49, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) via ipv6-wg <ipv6-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > > [This is about ARIN, but curious to see if anybody has any insight...] > A colleague of mine showed me https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET6-2630-2, i.e., a /16 allocated by ARIN to Capital One (AFAIK a US bank). > Of course, this may be a tool bug, or a human encoding mistake, else I will start to fear an IPv6 addresses exhaustion in the future (only 2**13 of /16 out of 2000::/3). > If anyone has any insight, then I will welcome this insight in this specific case. See the long thread on IETF v6ops: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ThaSy_hNlx1GP59EFAJ9NkBXP5A/ Noting, as I did there, the US DoD got a /13 (14x /22) around 2008.... so a /16 is peanuts ;) Greets, Jeroen
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Allocating a /16 to a large enterprise ?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Allocating a /16 to a large enterprise ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]