[ipv6-wg] Clear Guidance for Enterprises
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Clear Guidance for Enterprises
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Clear Guidance for Enterprises
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael Richardson
mcr+ietf at sandelman.ca
Sun Jul 30 21:08:32 CEST 2023
Xuo Guoto via ipv6-wg <ipv6-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > 1. How will we assign address to routers? Like will we should be > assigning 2001:db8:2000::1/35 or 2001:db8:2000::1/64 for router No. Each router needs a /128 as a loopback address to use. I assign them all from a single /64 for that purpose. The /128s go into the your IGP. Many of your p2p ethernet links between sites/routers might not need prefixes at all. > interface? 2. How will we be assigning static address to (DNS?) > servers? I don't understand the question. > 2.1 One IP from /35? 2.2 An IP from the /64 assigned to No. Why would you be throwing /35s around? If your DNS servers participate in IGP, then a /128 on a loopback interface, assuming they have multiple interfaces works. Otherwise a static allocation from the /64 that the routers provide. > We have three interfaces in the router with one facing upstream and is > using a /127 assigned by the up stream provider, of the other two one > iface is for servers and another for BNGs. How are ipv6 address > allocated in these interfaces. Statically? -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF at sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS* -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 658 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20230730/8ae5dcac/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Clear Guidance for Enterprises
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Clear Guidance for Enterprises
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]