[ipv6-wg] Question about how I handle web sites in my IPv6 survey
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Question about how I handle web sites in my IPv6 survey
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Czech government announced IPv4 end date
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Prior
mrp at mrp.net
Tue Jan 2 13:30:47 CET 2024
On 2/1/2024 22:50, Tim Chown wrote: > I suppose 80 being open these days is a ‘fail’ of sorts… but probably > best not to rathole into non IP-specific issues (we tend to use > https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/ <https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/>) and > rather highlight differences in v4 and v6 behaviour that the sites may > be unaware of. I believe (and so does my script :-) that port 80 is the starting point so it should be open but it should have a 301 (Moved Permanently) redirect to port 443, where TLS is correctly implemented. >> In the slightly different case where the redirect points to a location >> that doesn't have a AAAA the script will mark this as a failure with >> "redirect lacks AAAA". > > We have some unusual behaviour for jisc.ac.uk, that varies for v4/v6 and > whether the www is prepended. I think this is being worked on. The typical problem child is that www.$domain has A and AAAA records and there is a "web service" listening on those addresses which has some sort of redirect to just $domain. Sadly it only has a A record and this results in my script being sad, and you get the forementioned diagnostic. > And thanks for the tools :) You're welcome, and good luck herding the cats. Mark.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Question about how I handle web sites in my IPv6 survey
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Czech government announced IPv4 end date
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]