[members-discuss] amendment proposal for the Article of association
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] amendment proposal for the Article ofassociation
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] amendment proposal for the Article of association
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thilo Bangert
bangert at parknet.dk
Wed Mar 28 11:10:17 CEST 2012
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 08:07:09 PM sergey myasoedov wrote: > Dear members of the RIPE NCC, > > as you probably know, there are more than 8.000 members in the RIPE NCC > association. There are a lot of us. > > Members of the association can discuss things regarding the activity > of association on General Meetings two times yearly. According to the > Article of Association (AoA), the Agenda of GM has been performed by > executive board. > > There are some obligative things to be included in the Agenda > (elections, budget, charging scheme etc), and some things can be discussed > upon proposal of the EB. Another possiblity to put some things into Agenda > is the request of association members. > > Currently at least 2% of members should vote for adding items into > Agenda. Respective to the total number of members this means that _160_ > LIRs should ask the EB to discuss something that is not included in the > Agenda. > > From my opinion that is too much. No more than 250-300 members are > usually attending GM, even with the electronic voting. And 2% threshold > means ~50% of active members, so there is no possibility to raise any > question to the GM level. given your problem statement, i'd like to ask how often agenda items are dropped because they do not reach the limit of 2%? and how many of them do reach 0.3%? basically i'd like to know how big the problem is now, and how much smaller it would become, if your proposal would be implemented. thanks kind regards Thilo -- Thilo Bangert parknet.dk
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] amendment proposal for the Article ofassociation
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] amendment proposal for the Article of association
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]