[members-discuss] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Dec 16 11:43:03 CET 2013
Hi, On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:40:04AM +0100, Rade Djurasinovic wrote: > IPv4 market should be illegal. > How someone can sell IPv4 address space, if RIPE is allocating address > space based on their needs??? > If they sell addresses, RIPE allocated to them more than they need. The allocation policies always included room for growth - and in some cases, growth did not happen as planned, or the customer structure changed, resulting in some unused allocations. The IPv4 policy never had terms for reclaiming unused allocations - and that was pointed out clearly at the address policy working group meeting two years ago. There was no mandate from the community either to change that. There are a lot of "it should be..." or "it would be nice if...", but there's also a lot of reality out there. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 826 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20131216/2331b0e8/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Complaints against LIRs ignored by NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]