[members-discuss] IPV4 market
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] IPV4 market
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] IPV4 market
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Dec 16 12:54:33 CET 2013
Hi, On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:10:09AM +0000, Sajjad Najafi Zadeh [ MTNIrancell ] wrote: > Why ripe is not doing re-evaluation for large IP spaces and take back from LIRs if they are not using them to stop this IP market ? As explained, the address policy framework has no provisions for "taking back" allocations. So: the RIPE NCC *cannot* do that. Even if the policy framework would be changed today, it would be doubtful whether that can be applied retroactively. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 826 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20131216/b7aaf5d2/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] IPV4 market
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] IPV4 market
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]