[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paul Civati
paul at racksense.com
Sat Feb 13 23:33:41 CET 2016
On 13 Feb 2016, at 19:20, Matthias Šubik wrote: > +1 here, > as I did elaborate a bit on the ideas, the main reason is, I see LIRs around me already talking about opening another LIR first, before asking me if I’m doing the same or this new v6 thing. > > I doubt the higher fees would suffice, as they are passed on to the customer, and only help large incumbent telcos, sitting on a better pile of unused or unoptimized ip space. I was really thinking a multi-pronged approach, admin + cost + technical, combined together to create as much of a disincentive as possible. I'm not sure any single option alone will be enough. For some reason I had just assumed that essentially people were just running out of IPv4 space and looking to obtain some more. I had not considered that they were possibly selling this on to a customer as a 'product/service/solution'! Regards, Paul. -- Paul Civati <paul(at)racksense.com> 0870 321 2855 Rack Sense Ltd - Managed Service Provider - www.racksense.com
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Members and Multiple LIR Accounts - Please Discuss
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]