[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Sat Sep 17 22:29:20 CEST 2016
On 17/09/16 11:23, Radu-Adrian Feurdean wrote: >> RIPE cannot and will not do this, let me explain why. According to RIPE, >> and most RIR's, their stance is that you do not "own" the IP addresses >> that are given to you, and that they can technically take them back at > > ... and then you have the transfer market, where people got IP addresses > for free some years ago and now they sell them for profit. This the > starting point of all this. Some LIRs do agree and support the "one does > NOT own IPs" stance, other don't or no longer do. Generally those that > need IP space tend to agree, those that have excess not. Of course there > are exceptions.... The strict status is that LIRs have a right to use an internet resource (they do not own it). They can transfer that right to use (but not the resource itself). Just trying to inject a bit of clarity. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]