[members-discuss] VL: IP transfer (in)security
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] VL: IP transfer (in)security
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] VL: IP transfer (in)security
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Janis Jaunosans
jj at streamnetworks.lv
Tue May 15 14:25:41 CEST 2018
imagine if we used CLNS "addresses", oh my.. :> On 14/05/2018 14:56, Floris Bos wrote: > On 05/14/2018 12:00 PM, Thomas A. Bibb wrote: >> IPv4 is still widely used and mores to the point that adoption is >> somewhat lacking due to major access networks not deploying v6. > > Yes, and wonder if there doesn't need to be put a little bit more > pressure on them to get that implemented. > > What about doing some government lobbying in major markets (EU/US) to > make IPv6 support a legal requirement for public access providers in > the name of interoperability? > > > Yours sincerely, > > Floris Bos > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss > Unsubscribe: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/jj%40streamnetworks.lv
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] VL: IP transfer (in)security
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] VL: IP transfer (in)security
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]