[members-discuss] [exec-board] ripe-ncc-executive-board-election-task-force-report

Hi Sascha,

> Who determines that non-adherence has occurred and what are the
> consequences? 

It is clearly said that RIPE Trusted Contacts should be asked.

https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/gm/meetings/october-2020/ripe-ncc-executive-board-election-task-force-report.pdf

-- 
Kind regards,
Sergey Myasoedov

You wrote Wednesday, October 28, 2020, 4:27:54 PM:


> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:44:28AM +0100, Piotr Strzyzewski via members-discuss wrote:
>>You are right that the wording of the statement "that he/she has never
>>committed any fraud or other financial misconduct in any jurisdiction"
>>is very broad. This was deliberately done.
>>
>>In principle, RIPE NCC will assume the correctness of the statements
>>provided by the nominees. Therefore, RIPE NCC will not become an arbiter
>>whether or not a certain action of a nominee constitutes fraud.

> Then, why have this statement at all? *Who*, if anyone,
> determines whether a nominee (or elected board member) has
> committed fraud or misconduct and therefore has lied on their
> nomination? And what are the consequences of that?

> Similarly, the nominee has to declare "that he/she shall adhere
> to the Code of Conduct for candidates for the Executive Board as
> adopted by the Executive Board and published on the
> Association's website,"

> Who determines that non-adherence has occurred and what are the
> consequences? 

> I don't think anyone should vote in favour of these amendments
> until and unless these concerns are clarified.

> rgds,
> Sascha Luck

> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
> Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/kaa%40net-art.cz