[members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Open House: Recording and Slides Available
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Open House: Recording and Slides Available
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Open House: Recording and Slides Available
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sebastian-Wilhelm Graf
ripe-members at sebastian-graf.at
Mon Apr 1 15:59:48 CEST 2024
As a small LIR, i would like to see something of the following per LIR (Staying with 1 vote per lir, as it is now) - Base Membership Fee (something moderate like 1000 Euro/Year) - purely used for running the Registry/DB and the associated infrastructure. - Then small "additional" fee based onhow many resources are allocated to a LIR. (0 if below a /19, More if above) This would reflect the fact that every lir makes use of the registry/db to some extent. ipe-members at sebastian-graf.at Furthermore as a second idea i would also like to see that many of the "extra" expenses incured by the RipeNCC are moved to a second legal entidy that organisations can join and contribute to, if they are interested. Alternativly this could also be done with a second budget, not tied to the registery (and therefore not included in the base fee). For this i would propose just tiers that organisations can pick up (something like bronze/silver/gold/platinum) with different pricing. This would be: - In person Training/Events - Useful projects like Atlas,... - Community funding of external projects. A really "amazing" thing for the other budget/entidy would be if it implemented a yearly (or bi-yearly) vote, for members on how much (in percent of their contribution) should be spent on what project. Helping drive development in areas that are useful. Kind Regards On 4/1/24 3:28 PM, Daniel Pearson wrote: > I'm fine with paying a simple flat fee of 0.1 € per v4 address per > year if that means one IPv4 Equals one vote. > > If I pay more, then my vote counts for more, plain and simple. > > If you don't think that will come to pass, then you don't understand > the magnitude of politics and money as a driving force. > > Daniel~ > > On 4/1/24 08:06, Mihail Fedorov wrote: >> Which, by strange coincidence, almost identical to simple flat fee of >> 0.1 € per v4 address per year. >> >> The only difference is that owner of single /24 can pay 25 € per year >> and owner of /16 - 6375 € without steps or limitations required. >> >> Still giving RIPE approx 60 mil budget together. >> >> Literally everyone benefits - including companies that actually need >> a lot of addresses and currently buying them on aftermarket terribly >> overpriced. >> >>> On 1 Apr 2024, at 15:38, ivaylo <ivaylo at bglans.net> wrote: >>> >>> >>> The subject of this discussion go a lot ofside. I dont know why you >>> bloat the theme (maybe it is intensionly ?) leading it to IPV4 >>> holding. Our main focus _SHOULD_ be RIPE budget and financing + >>> sustainabla operation in the next year and in the future at all. >>> This of course is related with the members fee. >>> >>> I done a little research and calculations, to tune my initial >>> propousal so: By IANA public documents current delegated resources >>> to RIPE are: >>> >>> 86016 IPV4 /19 blocks >>> 66624 IPV6 /27 blocks >>> 42882 ASN >>> >>> If we have a hard coded limits for each LIR, equal steps up, and >>> member fee of 750 EURO per year, each LIR can hold up to: >>> >>> 1 x /19 IPV4 BLOCK (sumary = 32 x /24 networks) >>> 1 x /27 IPV6 BLOCK (sumary = 32 x /32 networks) >>> 16 ASN numbers >>> >>> After pass one of the above parameters even with one /24 IPV4, /32 >>> IPV6, or ASN, +750 euro (1500 euro RIPE fee) up to the next >>> proporcional limit: >>> >>> 2 x /19 IPV4 BLOCK (sumary = 64 x /24 networks) >>> 2 x /27 IPV6 BLOCK (sumary = 64 x /32 networks) >>> 32 ASN numbers >>> >>> and so on... >>> >>> This will generate 64 512 000 euros annual budget for RIPE which is >>> absolutely enough for normal operations in each of the next 10 >>> years, without need to increse members fee each year. >>> >>> If somebody is afraid, that other RIRs will not keep going with RIPE >>> fees, and there will be posibly leave of the big resource holders, >>> keep in mind that all small members from the other RIRs will move to >>> RIPE. Also good luck moving to ARIN db mess, the risk to lost route >>> of your prefixes is nearly 90%. >>> >>> ---------- >>> Off topic: About IPV4/IPV6 resources, it is imposible to create kind >>> of ipv4 adress space extension. Many hardware do lookup over the ip >>> header, it is not only software related. Even somebody develope a >>> public standart about that, will take decades before all replacing >>> equipment all over the world and another decades all to be workable. >>> We have working IPV6, right now more than 52% has IPV6 connectivity. >>> Biggest EU access operator already >>> give dual stack IPV4/IPV6 even to their end users, and activlly >>> deploy IPV6 stack into their networks. It is much more cheaper in >>> long perspective than to buy/rent IPV4 (NAT/proxy your >>> clients/services over IPV4 and give them IPV6 real addresses). After >>> 2-3 years the core of the Internet will be over IPV6, yes we will >>> need to support IPV4 for the next 10-15 years to provide backward >>> connectivity, but it is a dead end. All who thinks they will do a >>> big profit from IPV4 adresses they hold, do seriously mistake in >>> their logic, but anyway it is their problem. Those who dont >>> implement IPV6 because "yay it is so scary and not working" in one >>> moment will have to do this fast without experience, because will >>> have seroius troubles with IPV4 connectivity. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Ivaylo Josifov >>> VarnaIX / Varteh LTD >>> +359 52 969393 >>> Varna, Bulgaria >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> members-discuss mailing list >>> members-discuss at ripe.net >>> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss >>> Unsubscribe: >>> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mihail%40fedorov.net >> _______________________________________________ >> members-discuss mailing list >> members-discuss at ripe.net >> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss >> Unsubscribe: >> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%40privatesystems.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss > Unsubscribe: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripe-members%40sebastian-graf.at -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20240401/dbc44f9e/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Open House: Recording and Slides Available
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Open House: Recording and Slides Available
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]