[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Pearson
daniel at privatesystems.net
Wed Apr 10 14:46:07 CEST 2024
Is it? If people are not told that they have a fourth choice, they may be led to incorrectly believe that they only have three choices. I think not explicitly stating the fact that we can still say "no" is deceptive. Daniel~ On 4/10/24 7:44 AM, Rob Evans wrote: > Hi, > >> Why do we not have an option that refuses any rate increases, and forces RIPE to reduce it's budget? >> >> Option D - No change to rates, RIPE reduces budget according to fewer number of LIR! > I believe that is implicit if options A, B and C are all voted down. > > Rob >
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]