[members-discuss] Unfair RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Unfair RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Unfair RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Servperso
ml at servperso.com
Wed Apr 10 15:08:07 CEST 2024
I approve that one too. It's the model other RIR use now. Le 10-04-24 à 14:59, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED a écrit : > Totally agreed! RIPE need to make resources based fee, nor trying to > make budged on small LIRs. > > On 10.04.2024 12:36, Евгений Удовихин wrote: >> Hello colleagues! >> >> I propose to add option "D" of LIR fees proportional to the number of >> IP resources and ASNs of a given LIR. Now we have an unfair situation >> when small companies and huge corporations pay the same amount. >> >> Thank you! >> >> _______________________________________________ >> members-discuss mailing list >> members-discuss at ripe.net >> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss >> Unsubscribe: >> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/admin%40roskomnadzor.io >> > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss > Unsubscribe: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ml%40servperso.com
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Unfair RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Unfair RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]