[members-discuss] Charging Scheme 2025
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging Scheme 2025
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging Scheme 2025
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Pearson
daniel at privatesystems.net
Wed Apr 10 15:43:58 CEST 2024
IPv4 sells in the private market for anywhere from $40-$50 per address. When a /24 is worth $10,000~ When a /22 is worth $40,000~ When a /20 is worth $162,000~ Do you really think you will motivate someone to give them up by charging 0.1 EUR per address? That's just a fantasy. On 4/10/24 8:34 AM, Mihail Fedorov wrote: > Hello. > > Because it solves both purposes > > - some small motivation for unused “hoarded” IP address space to be > distributed back to those who suffer from total lack of them - at > least a little bit will go back to market. There are still really A > LOT of entities who hoard them not for the purpose of need (now or in > future, commercial or not), but ONLY because some time ago v4 > distribution was not managed properly. This, per my opinion, should be > somehow resolved. > > - small LIR’s without large clients or subnets should not fund RIPE > expensive projects on equal basis with transcontinental corporations. > Latter will easily agree on 100x price increase just to knock off > anyone else - still not even notice this fee. But existing fee and its > increase is more than significant for smaller networks or someone > trying to enter market. > > What I see in proposed schemes is total lack of choice. Let’s not > pretend that increase to 1800, increase 1850 or increase to 1900 is > actually a choice. It is not! And what I see in this mailing list is > that almost everyone agree with this fact. > > My initial proposal remains the same: 0.1 EUR (adjusted to real RIPE > financial needs) per v4 address in use. Absolutely flat and fair. It > will be eventually distributed up to the IP end user by supply chain > and be totally unnoticeable for them. > > At least there should be couple of more options in vote if community > opinion really counted. Otherwise vote is nonsense, why it is needed > at all? > > >> On 10 Apr 2024, at 16:09, Евгений Удовихин <eudovihin at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> At least because large IP holders now have no motivation to release >> them. The dependence of the contribution on the number of addresses >> used will give an additional incentive not to keep unnecessary >> address space. >> >> Ср, 10 апр. 2024 г. в 22:59, Michel Lanners <michel.lanners at lu-cix.lu>: >> >> Dear all, >> >> Why on earth is everybody trying to monetize IPv4, i.e. make RIPE >> fees dependant on IPv4 ressources? >> >> I completely fail to see why anybody should pay more for HOLDING >> any number of IPv4 ressources (or other ressources, by the way). >> >> It’s a different story for ressource transfers. So let those >> selling IPv4 pay a fee for the transfer! >> >> And for the rest let’s stick to a real membership fee: one price >> irrespective of which services you use or not. The fitness center >> doesn’t charge you per minute, nor per device you use. It's a >> flat membership, full stop. Hopefully low enough so it doesn’t >> create a problem for anybody's bottom line. >> >> Cheers >> >> *Michel LANNERS* >> CIO at LU-CIX Management G.I.E. >> -- >> <https://www.luxchat.lu/> >> Mail:michel.lanners at lu-cix.lu >> Luxchat: @3eb2pdflrq57:01.lu-cix.luxchat.lu >> <http://01.lu-cix.luxchat.lu/> >> Phone: (+352) 28 99 29 92-81 >> *LU-CIX Management G.I.E.* >> 202, Z.A.E. Wolser F >> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/202,+Z.A.E.+Wolser+F?entry=gmail&source=g> >> L-3290 Bettembourg >> lu-cix.lu <https://www.lu-cix.lu/> >> luxchat.lu <https://www.luxchat.lu/> >> luxembourg-internet-days.com <https://luxembourg-internet-days.com/> >> lunog.lu <https://www.lunog.lu/> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> members-discuss mailing list >> members-discuss at ripe.net >> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss >> Unsubscribe:https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/eudovihin%40gmail.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> members-discuss mailing list >> members-discuss at ripe.net >> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss >> Unsubscribe:https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mihail%40fedorov.net > > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss > Unsubscribe:https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%40privatesystems.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20240410/93797051/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging Scheme 2025
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging Scheme 2025
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]