[members-discuss] [RFC] Motion/Proposal for Amendments to RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [RFC] Motion/Proposal for Amendments to RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [RFC] Motion/Proposal for Amendments to RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alarig Le Lay
alarig at grifon.fr
Thu Apr 11 21:44:01 CEST 2024
On Thu 11 Apr 2024 14:36:35 GMT, Daniel Pearson wrote: > Hi Denys, > > Thank you for bringing forth this motion, I do not disagree with it on > it's premise. I also fully agree with the call for RIPE to reduce its > budget accordingly. > > I would recommend one addition to your proposal. > > "We suggest that RIPE NCC implement a weighed voting model based upon > the number of resources billed to a LIR. This would ensure that a LIR is > equally represented directly in relation to it's financial contribution > to RIPE." > > If such a motion is added, I'm sure those who will pay substantially > higher amounts will not object to having one vote per billed subnet or a > similar implementation. So next year they can revert all the work and nobody will have enough vote to go against? -- Alarig
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [RFC] Motion/Proposal for Amendments to RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [RFC] Motion/Proposal for Amendments to RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]