[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at interall.co.il
Fri Apr 12 07:50:35 CEST 2024
On 11/04/2024 15:38, Mihail Fedorov wrote: > Charging per ASN is even worse than just price increase. It is terrible and killing even more LIRs > > Imagine rather new LIR who is trying to do business based on what is LIR intended for - providing LIR services to consumers. For example 30 clients who requested ASN sponsorship during year. > If charged per ASN they will pay twice more than huge corporations serving only purpose of their own. Those typically have just 1-2 ASNs and tons of resources attached to it. They are main source of work for RIPE staff and they should be funding expensive projects like Atlas and others. I fail to understand how charging 50E or even 500E for an ASN would cripple any company. If the ASN fee were to rise and you manage 30 downstream clients - each of which requested an ASN - you simply show them that the actual cost is now 500E and not 50E. If 500E per ASN is enough to cripple a company then perhaps your business model needs to be adjusted. Regards, Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]