[members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)

With a charging scheme based on resources, a /32 is bound to be cheaper 
than a /29. Even so, a small LIR with a /29 would still pay less than 
with the current charging scheme.

It is possible to put less charges on IPv6 by increasing Offset_IPv6, 
but it would need to be compensated by an increase in Base_Fee and it 
would be less proportional.


On 16/04/2024 16:37, Mihail Fedorov wrote:
> I once again advise to put less charges on IPv6. Genrally it’s a good 
> and correct approach. But in current reality this will result need to 
> restructure v6 subnets for everyone, who opted into /29 but using /32 
> (which is what many small LIRs do) and create additional work for 
> everyone. In some distant future there will be no difference but for now 
> every occasion to motivate networks to have IPv6 should be valued.