[members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)

Dear Fergal,

 

 

So we dont have now the possibility to offer new proposals for charging scheme here: https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/gm/member-proposals/ and we cant either offer any proposal for not chosing any offered options, right?

 

 

 

--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards

Murat TERZIOGLU
PREBITS

 

Bochumer Str. 20

44866 Bochum

Deutschland

 

Telefon: 0234/58825994

Telefax: 0234/58825995

 

 <http://www.prebits.de/> www.prebits.de

 <mailto:info at prebits.de> info at prebits.de

 

USt-ID: DE315418902

 

 

Von: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net> Im Auftrag von Fergal Cunningham
Gesendet: Montag, 22. April 2024 16:58
An: members-discuss at ripe.net
Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)

 

Dear Dmytro,

Making resolutions on the charging scheme for next year is solely the responsibility of the Executive Board. Proposing different versions is not possible. Please see also the mail I sent on Friday:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/2024-April/005454.html

Best regards,
Fergal

 

On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 1:44 PM Dmitry Kohmanyuk via members-discuss <members-discuss at ripe.net <mailto:members-discuss at ripe.net> > wrote:

On 22 Apr 2024, at 13:03, Sebastien Brossier <sebastien at brossier.org <mailto:sebastien at brossier.org> > wrote:
> 
> On 20/04/2024 11:44, Claudius Zingerli wrote:
>> I think IPv6 allocations larger than /29 aren't very common. Your proposal again puts too much load on smaller LIRs.
> I generated this alternate simulation to address the concerns of those with IPv6 /29 and a very small amount of IPv4, but it is indeed worse for everyone else. Billing IPv6 in a fair way is not easy when 90% of LIRs are in the same category.
> 
> Honestly, I prefer my initial proposal. Or James A.T. Rice's proposal if we're not going to charge for IPv6 at the moment.

Hi Sebastien,


I am examining formulas which involve a fixed price, as well as charges for both IPv4 and IPv6, and wondering if there is anyone who can help calculate the impact of merging LIRs or moving addresses on these (obviously not exactly.)

Additionally, I have a question about whether membership is able to propose any version to these charges for voting, subject to a signature threshold, or if it is solely the board's responsibility.

-- dk@

_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss at ripe.net <mailto:members-discuss at ripe.net> 
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40ripe.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20240422/982c2c71/attachment-0001.html>