[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
sdy at a-n-t.ru
sdy at a-n-t.ru
Mon Apr 22 20:49:29 CEST 2024
Hi! If it happen we always can return to current charge 'one equal payment' scheme. But now, looks like it never happen. > Hi! > > Anyway I believe that it just need some time. Eventually the increase in > IPv6 usage will do lead to the release of IPv4, as in the result nobody > will pay to purchase IPv4, and it is important to support it at this > stage. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: sdy at a-n-t.ru <sdy at a-n-t.ru> > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 7:22 PM > To: Naira Kuroyan <NKuroyan at telecomarmenia.am> > Cc: Members Discuss <members-discuss at ripe.net>; Simon-Jan Haytink > <simonjh at ripe.net>; interconnect <interconnect at telecomarmenia.am>; > core-network <core-network at telecomarmenia.am> > Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging > Scheme 2025 Proposals > > Hi! > > Unfortunately, the increase in IPv6 usage does not lead to the release of > IPv4. > It is necessary not only to introduce a fee for already issued IPv4 (at > least 0.1 cents), but also to charge 1000 times more for newly issued IPv4 > addresses (1 euro per year) if they are issued more than the limit (1024 > addresses). To reduce the attractiveness of their use. > >> Hi, >> >> Our offer is that the proposal can be somehow adjusted to the current >> LIR number (about 20’000) based on the fee we had years ago with >> 15’000 LIR number. >> >> We suppose that it is important to support the increase of IPv6 usage, >> so it is not reasonable to apply charges for the resources, especially >> IPv6, at least at this stage. >> Increase of IPv6 usage can change the situation significantly. >> >> Regards, >> Naira >> >> >> From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net> On Behalf Of >> Cynthia Revström via members-discuss >> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2024 5:42 PM >> To: Simon-Jan Haytink <simonjh at ripe.net> >> Cc: Members Discuss <members-discuss at ripe.net> >> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC >> Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals >> >> Hi, >> >> I would just like to say that unlike most others who have commented so >> far I'm pretty happy with these proposals for the most part. >> >> The RIPE NCC has barely increased its fees at all for about a decade >> despite a fair amount of inflation during that time. >> >> I support only offering charging schemes that are sustainable and >> won't require digging deep into the reserves. That's not what the >> reserves are for. >> >> Something to also remember is that the numbers of members has stayed >> pretty consistent, it's the number of LIR accounts that has reduced. I >> would suspect that a lot of costs for the NCC will be the similar >> regardless of if a member has one LIR account or five. >> >> -Cynthia >> > ----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]