[members-discuss] GM topic
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] GM topic
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Final RIPE NCC Charging Schemes for Members to Vote On
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ivaylo
ivaylo at bglans.net
Mon Apr 29 12:09:29 CEST 2024
https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/gm/member-proposals/4/ Is absolutely reasonable. If a LIR which do not hold legacy resources (legacy IPV4 space and legacy ASN space), and RIPE can not provide one of the 3 resource components (IPV4 space, IPV6 space, ASN), the anual fee should be at least 1/3 lower for the period the LIR do not have full list of components. You have my support on this. Ivaylo Josifov VarnaIX / Varteh LTD +359 52 969393 Varna, Bulgaria On Sat, 27 Apr 2024, Dmitry Kohmanyuk via members-discuss wrote: [NON-Text Body part not included]
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] GM topic
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Final RIPE NCC Charging Schemes for Members to Vote On
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]