[members-discuss] GM topic
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] GM topic
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Board Meeting on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Fri May 10 22:20:29 CEST 2024
Hi, On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 09:01:53PM +0200, Patrick Velder wrote: > > The AP WG has clearly voiced a need for an ASN reclaim mechanism > > I agree that a small fee would solve this problem. On the other hand, I > don't understand why ASNs should be more expensive than IPv4 or IPv6 > allocations. They wouldn't be? 50 EUR is on the table, which is the same amount as for an IPv4 or IPv6 assignment, and much less than a full LIR membership fee. > If we could agree on "Fees for sponsored ASNs" my answer would be yes, since > there is more work involved (like ID check) compared to an assignment to a > LIR. If the total budget stays the same, introducing a per-ASN fee would lower(!) the cost for all LIRs that only have 1 ASN for themselves - so, effectively, "the LIR's own ASN" is free. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20240510/a9e45457/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] GM topic
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Board Meeting on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]