[ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Jaeger
lists at complx.LF.net
Tue Aug 12 16:42:37 CEST 2003
Hi! > >> Does anyone believe that RIPE is not a "natural monopoly" for IP registry > >> services in Europe ? > > If you look at the service comparision matrix of the different > > RIRs (as published by RIPE), you can see that apparently all of > > them offer their service to anyone, not only their regional > > constituency. > you're quite correct. in american, i believe that's called a cartel. Is this really a cartel ? There are probably different pricing schemes and rules for each RIR ? http://www.ripe.net/rs/rir-comp-matrix-rev.html So, if someone does not like RIPE NCC services, get your IPs and ASes from one of the other RIRs ? Anything that does prohibit this ? Has anyone tried yet ? -- MfG/Best regards, Kurt Jaeger 17 years to go ! LF.net GmbH fon +49 711 90074-23 pi at LF.net Ruppmannstr. 27 fax +49 711 90074-33 D-70565 Stuttgart mob +49 171 3101372
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]