[ncc-services-wg] Proposal: Reduction of RIPE-NCC Actvities
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Proposal: Reduction of RIPE-NCC Actvities
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Proposal: Reduction of RIPE-NCC Actvities
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Galbavy
peter.galbavy at knowtion.net
Wed Aug 13 13:54:14 CEST 2003
Neil J. McRae wrote: > Agreed on the "spirit" of what you have to say. I also > think that there would need to a mention of something that > states that this should be done within the limits of the law > in Holland. Perhaps also consider immediate to by end > of 2003 to give time to hand over some projects to other > bodies/parties that might be interested in them. OK, based on your and other comments, I agree that the word "immediate" is inappropriate in (a). Some time scale should be included, else we will end up in a place where "tomorrow" is the timescale. "as soon as practical within the constraints of acceptable practise and law" perhaps ? > I think the most disappointing aspect of this situation is > that the RIPE NCC management team and board aren't leading > this discussion and that they themselves have not yet > realised that the situation as it stands is not fair to those > members who only want registration services. Amen. Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Proposal: Reduction of RIPE-NCC Actvities
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Proposal: Reduction of RIPE-NCC Actvities
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]