[ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [routing-wg] Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Feb 25 23:11:53 CET 2004
Hi, On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 10:23:48PM +0100, Jørgen Hovland wrote: > There are actually some people here doing exactly that: Sending packets > with an unroutable source-ip - with totally "legit" reasons. Could you be somewhat more specific about these "legit" reasons? [..] > Internet was probably designed for bi-directional communication, but it > doesn't mean you should ban one-way communication. One-Way communication works quite well with legit (read: assigned to the sender) source addresses. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 58081 (57882) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [routing-wg] Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]