[ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Wed Oct 17 23:16:21 CEST 2012
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:53:02PM +0200, Michael Markstaller wrote: >For a working Internet I'd appreciate a definite, clear, confirmed, >current contact for resources in case of abuse etc.. For the n-th time now in this thread: The LIR IS NOT RESPONSIBLE for abuse from a sponsored PI range. Same as the NCC IS NOT RESPONSIBLE for abuse from a PA range. As long as people will attempt to MAKE the LIRs responsible for their sponsored PI, I will oppose any such policy. Harassing a LIR for perceived abuse from a PI range wastes your time and pisses off the LIR. >I know some PI-owners (and thats why I fully agree with Randy's >position and refused to sponsor some of them over all of the years!) >that have 10yrs outdated contacts in the database, no response on >abuse for weeks - and no chance for the remaining 99,9% of the honest >and simply acting trustworthy people (LIRs) out there to contact them. That, the sponsoring LIR *IS* responsible for since 2007-01, so any non-contactable PI holders should be shut down when the next payday comes around at the latest. Also the NCC can shutdown LIRs for incorrect information, I assume that to include PI information. >That's the point where I want to know, whom to contact "upstream" to >clarify this.. Someone should be able to get contacted (not >responsible!).. A sponsoring LIR *may* be the upstream, in which case the ASPATH should show it. Many LIRs do not route their sponsored PI resources. >Just a suggestion: If its only about privacy, a tradeoff could be: >only visible for LIRs in lirportal (?) That may be acceptable, at least more so than making it uncontrolledly public. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]