[ncc-services-wg] Questions about the fax the RIPE NCC received from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI).
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Questions about the fax the RIPE NCC received from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI).
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Questions about the fax the RIPE NCC received from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI).
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Wed Sep 19 17:37:30 CEST 2012
Michael Markstaller wrote: > On 19.09.2012 09:31, Carsten Schiefner wrote: [...] > If a court decides that (any!) RIR/LIR has to block a country based on > trading-laws (or smthg. like that) the Internet begins to fail. > This won't happen, I'm pretty sure about that! You may be in for a nasty surprise :-( Courts to not understand the 'net, neither technically, nor socially or otherwise. > (and its also still useless as criminal minds will find a "workaround") That's a non-issue amongst lawyers and courts, unfortunately. Sigh... > But where if not here, could this be clearly said and discussed.. > > Michael Wilfried
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Questions about the fax the RIPE NCC received from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI).
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Questions about the fax the RIPE NCC received from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI).
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]