[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Tue Feb 5 15:00:53 CET 2013
> Coming back after stating my general support yesterday, to one of the > individual issues that may benefit from changes: > > I don't remember who already pointed fingers at the ROA service > (thanks!), but we - eventually - may have a pretty convincing carrot > by offering the "Certification of these data;" (which I read as being > ROA and future friends) only to LHRs that have established a formal > relationship and are paying for the service according to 2.1 ... 2.4. > > Certification is a service that has been developed recently by the > RIRs, so IMO there is no legacy "right" here. This would apply for the > cases described in 2.5 and certainly 2.6. < as one of the proposers > this carrot is not accidental. your first paragraph would seem to indicate that you would prefer to dilute this encouragement to form a formal relationship? am i misreading? randy
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]