[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Wed Feb 6 07:51:58 CET 2013
At 15:34 06/02/2013 +0900, Randy Bush wrote: > > Suppose we have 100 corner cases and they each own a /19. They have an > > auto-num, route and inetnum objects which is controlled by a mntner > > object. They send in an email to auto-dbm at ripe.net to update some phone > > number or email in order to keep the whois data uptodate. In my opinion, > > this is the only registry service they need and these 100 corner cases > > should be allowed to continue to do so. If they need something that > > requires human intervention - "anything", which can include a lost MD5 > > password for their mntner, then, at that point the RIPE NCC can state "pay > > membership dues in order for us to continue". > >s/memebrship dues/fees for the services/ Fine. -Hank >randy
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]