[ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at netability.ie
Wed Feb 6 15:30:38 CET 2013
On 04/02/2013 22:12, Måns Nilsson wrote: > The "completely estranged LRH holder organisation" is not that common, I > believe. Wasting electrons on this corner case is not fruitful. Problem is, I'm not sure it's a corner case; nor am I sure that the squatters are corner cases, nor the abandoned address blocks. Has the RIPE NCC done any preliminary analysis of the ERX space in terms of: - rough consistency of link between inetnum: owner and mntner - when was the last time the resources were updated - potential LIR association - whether prefix is visible in dfz I realise that this is very ill-specified. This might be useful in quantifying how much effort it would be worth expending in what you and Hank refer to as "corner cases", but which I would feel were more common. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] legacy holders paying for registration services and 2012-07v2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]