[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Philipp Kern
philipp.kern at kit.edu
Sat Feb 9 13:47:26 CET 2013
Måns, am Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:58:08AM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > > one has to wonder what criteria and methods the ncc uses. > A common example is "If you can produce an electricity invoice addressed > to the company, it is a piece in the puzzle. But the street address must > match." > > That last requirement is interesting when the organisation, as has been > the case with my last two employers, /does not have a street address/, > but instead has a postcode uniquely allocated to it: same here. But I'd still assume that such an invoice has a point of delivery mentioned that includes the street address. Kind regards Philipp Kern -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 490 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/attachments/20130209/81c20b09/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 Discussion Period extended until 21 February 2013 (RIPE NCC Service to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]